medflow Scale
Evidence → funding

Turn your evidence into funding.

Medflow Scale matches your studies and data to the grants, tenders, and reimbursement you can actually back — every recommendation justified requirement by requirement, and audit-ready. The model proposes; you decide.

The problem

Your most expensive asset is the one you use least.

Medical-product companies spend years and millions generating evidence — clinical studies, bench data, regulatory files — that then sits idle in PDFs between submissions. The funding and market access it could unlock goes unclaimed, because finding the right opportunities and proving you qualify is manual, consultant-driven, and error-prone. Companies miss what they'd have won, and burn effort on applications they were never eligible for.

How it works

Discover → prepare → decide.

Upload the evidence you already have. Scale matches it against a maintained, legally-cleared corpus of opportunities and returns ranked recommendations — each justified requirement by requirement against your own documents.

Discover

Find what fits

Scale surfaces the grants, tenders, and reimbursement routes relevant to your sector and technology — from a corpus that's maintained and freshness-monitored.

Prepare

Map your evidence

Your organisation profile and the evidence you hold are mapped to each opportunity's requirements — the system shows exactly what's supported and what's missing.

Decide

You act, on the record

You review the evidence-backed matches and decide what to pursue. The model proposes; the human acts; the trail is auditable.

The model proposes, the human acts, the trail is auditable. No auto-assertion — a human is always in the loop.

The honesty ladder

Every match, with the reasons showing. No vanity scores.

A match earns its place one honest rung at a time — never a pseudo-precise "94% fit."

1

Relevant

Matches your sector and technology. (A relevant match never means "you'll win it.")

2

Eligibility checks passed

The hard criteria we can check appear satisfied.

3

Evidence-backed fit

Your documents mapped to the programme's requirements — each one marked:

SupportedNot metUnconfirmed
Pursued opportunities are tracked to outcome — won · not awarded · withdrawn — an auditable funding track record.
Why it holds

Defensible by construction.

A maintained, cleared corpus

Legally-cleared and freshness-monitored. A deterministic eligibility gate excludes stale or improper opportunities before ranking.

Ranking that explains itself

Every point maps to a visible reason — sector, stage, evidence. No black box, no invented precision.

Auditable by construction

Every match is bound to the exact evidence and corpus versions used — defensible in a way a generic AI wrapper can't retrofit.

Your data stays yours

Exportable and deletable, any time. No lock-in.

Where it's going

Grants first — then the layers above them.

Grants
Now
Tenders
Next
Reimbursement
Then
Go-to-market
Later

Non-dilutive innovation funding is large and fragmented across the EU (Horizon Europe, EIC, Eurostars, national funds) and US (SBIR/STTR, NIH) — and the tender and reimbursement layers are larger still.

FAQ

Straight answers.

Does Scale decide or apply for me?
No. Scale proposes and justifies; a person always reviews and decides. The model proposes, the human acts, and the trail is recorded.
Is a "Relevant" match a promise I'll win?
No. The ladder is honest about how far a match has been checked — Relevant, then Eligibility passed, then Evidence-backed fit (Supported / Not met / Unconfirmed). It aims your effort; it doesn't guarantee an outcome.
What do I put in?
The evidence your company already holds — clinical evaluation reports, validation studies, regulatory files. It's your data; you can export and delete it at any time.
Who is it for?
Evidence-rich, funding-hungry medical-product SMEs — devices, diagnostics, digital health / SaMD — typically post-prototype and CE-marked, holding clinical and regulatory evidence but lean on grant and market-access staff.
Can I see the reasoning?
Yes. Every recommendation is justified requirement by requirement against your own documents, and bound to the exact evidence and corpus versions used.
Founding design partners

Shape how your evidence turns into funding.

The architecture is approved; the core database that guarantees tenant isolation, immutability, and audit is built and continuously tested; the product experience is designed and validated; the production build is underway with staging live and disaster-recovery proven. We're building with founding design partners now.

Become a design partner